ISSN (Print): Awaited ISSN (Online): 3048-8001
SPJP Proceedings Logo

SPJP Proceedings

Published by SPJ Publication

Open Access Journal

Short Communication

Influence of Tube Voltage (kVp) and Filtration on X-ray Beam Quality and Patient Dose in Diagnostic Radiography

Authors:
Nabanita Das
Arshad Alam Khan
Assistant Professor, Dept. of Radio Imaging Technology, School of Allied Health Science, SGT University, Gurugram, India
Ashita Jain
Assistant Professor, Dept. of Radio Imaging Technology, School of Allied Health Science, SGT University, Gurugram, India

Article Metrics
96
Views
48
Downloads
Altmetric

Abstract

Diagnostic radiology relies on the controlled production and optimization of X-ray beams to achieve high-quality diagnostic images while maintaining patient radiation exposure within safe limits. Among the key technical parameters influencing image quality and dose, tube voltage (kVp) and filtration play a central role in determining X-ray beam quality. Tube voltage governs the maximum and mean energy of the photon spectrum, thereby affecting beam penetration, image contrast, and radiation dose distribution. Filtration, on the other hand, selectively removes low-energy photons that contribute to patient dose without improving image formation, thereby hardening the beam and improving dose efficiency. This mini review provides a comprehensive overview of the physical principles underlying X-ray beam production, with a focused discussion on the effects of kVp and filtration on beam quality, image characteristics, and patient dose. It also highlights the clinical implications of parameter selection in different radiographic applications such as chest, skeletal, pediatric, and mobile radiography. Furthermore, recent advancements in spectral shaping, filtration technologies, and dose optimization strategies are discussed in the context of modern digital imaging systems. The review emphasizes the importance of balancing image quality and radiation protection in accordance with the ALARA principle. An understanding of kVp and filtration enables radiologic technologists to optimize imaging protocols, reduce unnecessary radiation exposure, and ensure diagnostic accuracy.

Keywords: X-ray beam quality, Tube voltage (kVp), Filtration; Radiation dose optimization, ALARA principle, Diagnostic radiography, Image quality, Half-value layer (HVL), Scatter radiation, Radiologic technologist.


Article Information
DOI: 10.62502/spjpp/v3i2art5
Journal: SPJP Proceedings
Abbreviation: SPJP Proceedings
ISSN (Print): Awaited
ISSN (Online): 3048-8001
Volume/Issue: 3(2)
Pages: 31-34

References
  1. Bushberg JT, Seibert JA, Leidholdt EM, Boone JM. The Essential Physics of Medical Imaging. 4th ed. Philadelphia: Wolters Kluwer; 2020.
  2. Chaudhry A. Analysis of Reject and Repeat Radiography in Diagnostic Imaging. Innov. J. Med. Imaging 2025;2(2):14-17. doi: 10.62502/ijmi/v2i2a214.
  3. Mettler FA, Guiberteau MJ. Essentials of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging. 7th ed. Philadelphia: Elsevier; 2019.
  4. Martin CJ, Sutton DG. Practical radiation protection in diagnostic radiology. Radiography. 2015;21(2):e1–e7.
  5. European Commission. Radiation Protection No. 180: Diagnostic Reference Levels in Medical Imaging. Luxembourg: EC; 2014.
  6. Seibert JA. X-ray imaging physics for nuclear medicine technologists. J Nucl Med Technol. 2013;41(1):3–11.
  7. McCollough CH, et al. Strategies for reducing radiation dose in CT imaging. Radiol Clin North Am. 2009;47(1):27–40.
  8. Vassileva J, Rehani MM. Patient dose optimization in medical imaging. Radiat Prot Dosimetry. 2015;165(1–4):1–4.
  9. Boone JM. The importance of beam quality in diagnostic radiology. Med Phys. 2017;44(3):e1–e15.
  10. Kumar P, Satpathy S, Ram* A. Assessment of patient perception and comfort in radiological procedures: a prospective study from a tertiary care hospital in eastern india. Innov. J. Med. Imaging 2025;2(2):18-24. doi: 10.62502/ijmi/v2i2a18
  11. Samei E, Flynn MJ. A method for estimating x-ray exposure in digital radiography. Med Phys. 2002;29(3):339–350.
  12. Nazir F. Effectiveness of Automated Exposure Control and Protocol Standardization in Reducing Radiation Dose in Routine CT Examinations. Innov. J. Med. Imaging 2025;2(4):1-5. doi: 10.62502/ijmi/v2i4art4
  13. Shrivastava S, et al. Effect of filtration on X-ray beam quality and patient dose. J Med Phys. 2019;44(2):85–92.
  14. McNitt-Gray MF. AAPM/RSNA physics tutorial for residents: X-ray image formation in CT and radiography. Radiographics. 2002;22(4):1109–1124.
  15. International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP). Radiological Protection in Medicine (ICRP Publication 105). Ann ICRP. 2007;37(6):1–63.
How to Cite
Vancouver Style:
Das N, Khan AA, Jain A. Influence of Tube Voltage (kVp) and Filtration on X-ray Beam Quality and Patient Dose in Diagnostic Radiography. SPJP Proceedings 2026;3(2):31-34. doi: 10.62502/spjpp/v3i2art5