ISSN (Print): Awaited ISSN (Online): 3048-8001
SPJP Proceedings Logo

SPJP Proceedings

Published by SPJ Publication

Open Access Journal

Short Communication

The Technician’s Role and Responsibilities For Handling Claustrophobic Patients

Authors:
Gautam Yadav *
Dept. of Radio Imaging Technology, School of Allied Health Science, SGT University, Gurugram, India
Piyush Kant Co-Author
Assistant Professor, Dept. of Radio Imaging Technology, School of Allied Health Science, SGT University, Gurugram, India
Arshad Alam Khan Co-Author
Assistant Professor, Dept. of Radio Imaging Technology, School of Allied Health Science, SGT University, Gurugram, India
Ashita Jain Co-Author
Assistant Professor, Dept. of Radio Imaging Technology, School of Allied Health Science, SGT University, Gurugram, India
* Corresponding Author

Article Metrics
53
Views
89
Downloads
Altmetric

Abstract

Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) is an essential diagnostic imaging modality widely used for the evaluation of numerous medical conditions due to its excellent soft-tissue contrast and non-invasive nature. Despite its clinical advantages, many patients experience anxiety, stress, and claustrophobia during MRI examinations because of the confined scanner environment, loud acoustic noise, prolonged scan duration, and fear of unknown procedures. These psychological responses can negatively affect patient cooperation, image quality, and examination completion rates. MRI technologists play a critical role in minimizing these challenges through effective communication, patient education, emotional support, and continuous monitoring throughout the imaging process. Proper pre-scan counselling and procedural explanations help patients develop realistic expectations and reduce uncertainty. Empathetic interactions, reassurance, and recognition of anxiety-related behaviours further enhance patient comfort and trust. Various non-pharmacological interventions, including relaxation techniques, guided imagery, video-based preparation, environmental modifications, and the use of open-bore MRI systems, have demonstrated effectiveness in reducing anxiety and claustrophobic reactions. In severe cases, pharmacological interventions may be considered under appropriate medical supervision. This review highlights the multifaceted role of MRI technologists in anxiety management and examines evidence-based strategies for improving patient experiences during MRI examinations. Effective implementation of these approaches contributes to enhanced patient satisfaction, improved compliance, reduced motion artifacts, and successful diagnostic outcomes.

Keywords: Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI); Patient Anxiety; Claustrophobia; MRI Technologist; Patient Communication.


Article Information
DOI: 10.62502/spjpp/v3i2art8
Journal: SPJP Proceedings
Abbreviation: SPJP Proceedings
ISSN (Print): Awaited
ISSN (Online): 3048-8001
Volume/Issue: 3(2)
Pages: 44-48

References

 

  1. Almutlaq ZM. Discussion of the causes, effect and potential methods of alleviating patient anxiety when undergoing magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Saudi J Health Sci. 2023;12(2):85-94.
  2. Hudson DM, Heales C, Meertens R. Review of claustrophobia incidence in MRI: a service evaluation of current rates across a multi-centre service. Radiography (Lond). 2022;28(3):780-787.
  3. McNulty JP, McNulty S. Acoustic noise in magnetic resonance imaging: an ongoing issue. Radiography (Lond). 2019;25(4):320-326.
  4. Mackenzie R, Sims C, Owens RG, Dixon AK. Patients' perceptions of magnetic resonance imaging. Clin Radiol. 1995;50(3):137-143.
  5. Hamd ZY, Alorainy AI, Alrujaee LA, Alshdayed MY, Wdaani AM, Alsubaie AS, et al. How different preparation techniques affect MRI-induced anxiety of MRI patients: a preliminary study. Brain Sci. 2023;13(3):416.
  6. Carlsson S, Carlsson E. The situation and the uncertainty about the coming result scared me but interaction with the radiographers helped me through: a qualitative study on patients' experiences of magnetic resonance imaging examinations. J Clin Nurs. 2013;22(21-22):3225-3234.
  7. Velloso LGC, Duprat MDL, Martins R, Scoppetta L. Hypnosis for control of claustrophobia during magnetic resonance imaging examinations. Radiol Bras. 2010;43(1):19-22.
  8. Dewey M, Schink T, Dewey CF. Claustrophobia during magnetic resonance imaging: cohort study in over 55,000 patients. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2007;26(5):1322-1327.
  9. Enders J, Zimmermann E, Rief M, Martus P, Klingebiel R, Asbach P, et al. Reduction of claustrophobia during magnetic resonance imaging: methods and design considerations. Eur Radiol. 2011;21(5):1104-1111.
  10. Meléndez JC, McCrank E. Anxiety-related reactions associated with magnetic resonance imaging examinations. JAMA. 1993;270(6):745-747.
  11. Kilborn LC, Labbe EE. Magnetic resonance imaging scanning procedures: development of phobic response during scan and at one-month follow-up. J Behav Med. 1990;13(4):391-401.
  12. Törnqvist E, Månsson Å, Larsson EM, Hallström I. Impact of extended written information on patient anxiety and image motion artefacts during magnetic resonance imaging. Acta Radiol. 2006;47(5):474-480.
  13. Slifer KJ, Koontz KL, Cataldo MD. Operant-contingency-based preparation of children for functional magnetic resonance imaging. J Appl Behav Anal. 2002;35(2):191-194.
  14. Eshed I, Althoff CE, Hamm B, Hermann KG. Claustrophobia and premature termination of magnetic resonance imaging examinations. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2007;26(2):401-404.
  15. Murphy KJ, Brunberg JA. Adult claustrophobia, anxiety and sedation in MRI. Magn Reson Imaging. 1997;15(1):51-54.
How to Cite
Vancouver Style:
Yadav G, Kant P, Khan AA, Jain A. The Technician’s Role and Responsibilities For Handling Claustrophobic Patients. SPJP Proceedings 2026;3(2):44-48. doi: 10.62502/spjpp/v3i2art8